Interfaith Relations In The Quran: A Contextual And Comparative Study Of Misinterpretations Of Selected Verses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/tilawah.v2i4.62Keywords:
Qur’anic Contextualization, Asbab Al-Nuzul, Interfaith Relations, Exegetical Analysis, Religious Coercion.Abstract
This study critically examines selected Qur’anic verses frequently cited in Western writings and contemporary narratives as evidence of Islamic intolerance and religious hostility toward non-Muslims. The study aims to reassess such allegations by examining the relevant verses within their historical and exegetical contexts. A qualitative textual and comparative method is employed, drawing upon asbab al-nuzul literature and interpretations from classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegetes. Selected verses concerning interfaith relations such as; religious difference, non-compulsion and warfare,including Qur’an 109:1–6, 73:10–11, 2:256, 4:160–161, 9:5, 9:29, 9:41, 5:33, 2:190–192, 4:76, and 22:39–40 are analyzed in relation to the allegations made against them. The study finds that several criticisms result from reading individual verses in isolation from their occasions of revelation. The analysis demonstrates that the Qur an distinguishes between theological disagreement and social hostility.it also permits peaceful coexistence and prohibits religious coercion and unjust aggression. The study concludes that a contextual and exegetical reading provides a more clear understanding of Qur’anic teachings on interfaith relations.
References
Afifah, Nisrina Nur. The “Sword Verse” in Contemporary Tafsir Discourse: Analysis of Muhammad Abdel Haleem’s Interpretation in Understanding the Quran and Exploring the Quran. Undergraduate thesis, Department of Quranic Science and Tafsir, Faculty of Shariah, Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University Malang, 2024.
Al-Baydawi, Nasir al-Din Abu Said Abd Allah ibn Abi Umar ibn Muhammad al-Shirazi. Anwar al-Tanzil wa Asrar al-Tawil. Vol. 5. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Hilali, Salim ibn Eid, and Muhammad ibn Musa al-Nasr. Al-Istiab fi Bayan al-Asbab. 1st ed. 3 vols. Riyadh: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1425 AH/2004 CE.
Al-Muzayni, Khalid ibn Sulayman. Al-Muharrar fi Asbab Nuzul al-Quran min Khilal al-Kutub al-Tisah. Dammam: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, n.d.
Al-Sabuni, Muhammad Ali. Al-Tibyan. 1st ed. Beirut: Alam al-Kutub, 1405 AH/1985 CE.
Al-Sabuni, Muhammad Ali. Safwat al-Tafasir. Vol. 1. n.p.: n.p., n.d.
Al-Wahidi, Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Ahmad al-Naysaburi. Asbab al-Nuzul. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
Aziz, Ienash Huwaida, Fejrian Yazdajird Iwanebel, and Cecep Soleh Kurniawan. “From Protection to Inclusive Dialogue: A Contextual Interpretation of Surah al-Tawbah [9]:6 as the Basis for the Ethics of Dawah in Religious Plurality.” JUIT 1, no. 1 (June 2023): 51.
Baig, Hassan, and Hafsa Maqsood. “Addressing Emerging Challenges in Interfaith Relations through Quranic Teachings in the 21st Century.” Al-Idah 43, no. 1 (June 2025): 1–12.
Ibn Kathir, Ismail ibn Umar. Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim. n.p.: n.p., n.d.
Ice, Thomas D. “Islam Is NOT a Peaceful Religion.” Article Archives, no. 102 (May 2009).
Qutb, Sayyid. Fi Zilal al-Quran. Vol. 1. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq, n.d.
Rida, Muhammad Rashid. Tafsir al-Manar. Vol. 1. Edited by Ibrahim Shams al-Din. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, n.d.
Spencer, Robert. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2005.
Yusuf Ali, Abdullah. The Meaning of the Holy Quran.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammed Rashid N

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









